OpRisk & Compliance - Magazine on operational risk, corporate governance, business continuity, compliance, financial crime
OpRisk & Compliance - Free trial
OpRisk & Compliance - Magazine on operational risk, compliance About Oprisk & Compliance Subscribe to OpRisk & Compliance Advertise on OpRisk & Compliance Contacts at OpRisk & Compliance Free trial to OpRisk & Compliance Help on OpRisk & Compliance
Career Center Jobs and Career Management in the Financial Markets, Banking & Finance Career Center
  Job Seekers Sign in / Register Recruiter's Sign-in







ADVICE
 
THE OUTSIDER: Risk management? Yeah, right. Let’s have pay management
17 Jul 2008
What causes crashes and crises? Conventional wisdom used to be that markets reflected fundamental shifts in economic realities. When the economy steamed ahead too rapidly, stresses and strains in the system would eventually trip us up and the market would crash. But never too far. When it looked overdone, reality would kick in and markets would turn around. It all made sense in a comforting, reassuring way.

Today we’re more cynical. Media comment is all about bankers and hedge fund managers and the distorting effect of the bonus system. Journalists with annual earnings that barely make it into six figures and their noses pressed against the glass stare into the Square Mile and seem to think that greed, testosterone and lack of accountability combine to make people take risks that common sense and prudence might suggest are unwise. As if.

Granted, individual institutions and the people within them can exert far greater influence than anyone dreamed of, say, 20 years ago. Derivatives, leverage, synthetics, off balance sheet trades, Special Purpose Investment Vehicles – let’s call them SPIVs – have developed exponentially, so that a single rogue trader at a major firm can lose more money than you and I could spend in a lifetime. Or 10 lifetimes.

And what have we standing between us and the abyss, allowing us to sleep safely at night? Risk management. A dedicated team of specialists who apply reporting systems and impose order – we like to think of it as control – in areas where geriatrics like me would otherwise feel terrified that the firm was spinning crazily along the edge of the cliff. Phew.

But should we feel safe, or are risk managers the equivalent of a three year old’s comfort blanket? To begin with, who gets paid the most? The risk committee or the front-line revenue generators presenting their reassuringly well crafted proposals? And once you know who gets paid the most, you know who the smartest people in the room are.

The fact is that we have a system that incentivises short-term risk taking, and at a lot of firms that risk taking activity is inadequately supervised. It doesn’t matter when market conditions are benign: big bets pay off, and the risk takers start to think they really do walk on water.

But when the music stops and those same risk takers get a terrible wake-up call, all they lose is their annual bonus and maybe their jobs (though even being fired isn’t guaranteed, given how most firms prefer to paper over the cracks and hide their shortcomings). The real tab gets picked up by shareholders, customers and eventually – in the worst case – by the taxpayer.

So for once maybe the press are right. Human nature causes crashes and crises. Forget the system, the global economy, the blah-blah. It’s the greed, stupid. And it won’t change until every firm pays its people on a multi-year basis linked to long-term performance. That’s the real risk management that we all need, and that’s what would allow us to get back to good old-fashioned real crashes and crises.

David Charters’ latest book, The Ego Has Landed, is published by Elliott and Thompson, price £9.99.

Related Articles:
So you think you're underpaid?
Dr Dread: Bonuses are rotten, but necessary
Risk salary survey
Reader Comments
Date: 17 Jul 2008
Name/Email: Richard B ()
Company:
Banks have to answer to shareholders, shareholders are really only interested in the short-term (going on the current price of bank stock) even though the share price should reflect an infinite time horizon and so banks have to act on the short-term. Herding and hysteria will happen in the 'good' times as well as the 'bad' times. It is not in the interest of a bank to deviate from the market (in terms of strategy or expectations). Look at what happened to HBOS when it said last year (the height of the housing boom) that it was implementing a medium term strategy of reducing UK mortgage market share as it had become unprofitable and house prices looked dizzy - analysts panned it and HBOS reversed the strategy, in hindsight a strategy which was fully justified and appropriate. To quote Keynes; why worry about the long-run since in the long-run we are all dead?

Email this article Return to advice index
Print article
Search Archive
See all articles 
 
Send us your comments or article ideas

 


Poll
The likelihood of writedowns spreading to corporate debt is:
Very, very low: 0.0%
Lowish: 22.7%
I don't know: 27.3%
Very high: 40.9%
Very, very high: 9.1%
More to say?

ALSO IN THIS SECTION:

MORE NEWS & ADVICE:
JOB MARKET NEWS
PAY NEWS
GRADUATE / MBA NEWS
SALARY SURVEYS
ASK THE EXPERT
SECTORS EXPLAINED
ADVICE
A DAY IN THE LIFE
EMPLOYER PROFILES
© Incisive Media Ltd. 2007 Jobs at Incisive Media | Terms and conditions | Privacy policy | Accessibility statement