OpRisk & Compliance - Magazine on operational risk, corporate governance, business continuity, compliance, financial crime
OpRisk & Compliance - Free trial
OpRisk & Compliance - Magazine on operational risk, compliance About Oprisk & Compliance Subscribe to OpRisk & Compliance Advertise on OpRisk & Compliance Contacts at OpRisk & Compliance Free trial to OpRisk & Compliance Help on OpRisk & Compliance
Career Center Jobs and Career Management in the Financial Markets, Banking & Finance Career Center
  Job Seekers Sign in / Register Recruiter's Sign-in







GRADUATE / MBA NEWS
 
Lunchtime Links: Negative bonuses possible at UBS
By eFinancialCareers UK
18 Nov 2008
Yesterday’s unnerving bonus revelations from UBS have become more unnerving still now that there’s been time to digest them. The Times reports that as part of the new malus system for recouping bonuses in the event of everything from losses (group or division), asset writedowns, personal misconduct and missed performance targets, it will soon be possible for UBS senior bankers and 'risk takers' to accrue a negative bonus balance. The bank has apparently confirmed this, but it’s not immediately clear what the implications will be for anyone changing jobs – would departing bankers need to pay UBS for the pleasure of leaving to work elsewhere?

If some bozo on the other side of the world loses the company a fortune, you pay the price. (The Times).

Barclays bends a bit on bonuses. (Alphaville).

“What they forget is that most of these large bonuses go to men with expensive wives who like to spend.” (Fintag).

Other bank execs urged to go Goldman and relinquish bonuses. (FT).

Could Goldman Sachs go private? (Clusterstock).

Goldman manages to forge an implicit pact with the best and brightest: Give up your life, give us your soul, and at a relatively young age we'll make you really wealthy, even by Wall Street norms…. If the pool that feeds Goldman partners shrinks, or its returns fall, or the firm stops sending partners limited, the pressure builds from below, and the mechanism begins to break down. (The Deal).

HSBC cuts 500 jobs in Asia. (Bloomberg).

Cuts at Putnam. (FT).

Cuts at Blackrock. (Bloomberg).

Profits plunge at Macquarie. (Alphaville).

Dear Citi Colleagues, A few minutes ago I concluded a Town Hall meeting in New York… (DealBook).

Less to Citi’s job cuts than meets the eye. (Breaking Views).

Citi to cut less than 300 jobs in Singapore. (Reuters).

Connexion Capital hires someone. (FinAlternatives).

Hoare Capital markets launched in London. (Financial News).

Jobless of Henley on Thames, part II. (Telegraph).

Related Articles:
Shock of another 50,000 redundancies at Citigroup
Horrible hacking at RBS and Citigroup
Cuts come (again) to Morgan Stanley
Reader Comments
Date: 18 Nov 2008
Name/Email: hrvisionary ()
Company:
negative bonuses...absolutely..and i would propose that the Banks have the rights to the worldly chattels including spouses of their employees too. that would really make them focus on the game....1 mistake and your bonus goes 2 mistakes and your Wife goes 3 mistakes and we take your Car

Date: 18 Nov 2008
Name/Email: Ace ()
Company:
hrvisionary, please happily take the Wife away, and I'll throw in the mother-in-law for Free as well.

Date: 18 Nov 2008
Name/Email: Daniel Argyropoulos ()
Company:
I'm an (employed trader at a good house) why the hell would I go near UBS now? I can't see all IBs adopting neg bonus systems so if you're good at your job you arb the system to avoid any potential downside. Moreover, you just leave for a HF in 2 years... uncapped upside!

Date: 18 Nov 2008
Name/Email: thekingofmintsquare ()
Company:
Daniel Agryopoulos I can think of no witty/pithy comments..why dont you just arb off back to your good house. you utter plonker

Date: 18 Nov 2008
Name/Email: The Cynic ()
Company:
The negative bonus system sounds like it is open to abuse. Performance is highly subjective and favoured employees always benefit more than those who aren't in with the right managers. Personal misconduct is also very vague and can be used to penalise employees for technical breaches of the employee handbook or claimed misconduct since under Employment Law very little evidence is needed to "prove" misconduct against an employee who is out of favour.

Date: 18 Nov 2008
Name/Email: PoorBanker ()
Company:
Guys, the new bonus system is for the board not for the rest! Right things right! We punish the right people, not everyone!!

Date: 18 Nov 2008
Name/Email: peter ()
Company:
risk takers as well, they may finally start listening to the risk department!

Date: 19 Nov 2008
Name/Email: Jean A. ()
Company:
From golden parachutes to leaden parachutes... from one extreme to another! Hell why not sue the "criminal" too and out him/her in jail after taking everything he/she owns (house, car, savings, retirement plan!)... Let's make workplace a real fearful place and undermine new ideas and talented people in the name of a "risk-free environment". We haven't learned anything yet!

Date: 19 Nov 2008
Name/Email: edster999 ()
Company:
god bless UBS! A negative bonus in a downturn - a great response to todays banker blame game. Lets just call this great PR for UBS as any savvy banker would chop/change employer to arb the bonus scheme anyway. Big issue for me, an ex banker, is the media lynching of bankers. The proportion of "bankers" earning very serious bonuses is TINY - and those people are either top execs or front office traders who've made their employer lots of cash - as in every industry. Yes theres (historically) a premium on banking base salaries but this just reflected a wellfunded industry competing for talent - take a look at the uk invisibles balance of payments, then look at our manufacturing... who did best?! Most "bankers" are actually just ordinary salesmen, ops guys and accountants who happen to work for a bank. They take a premium salary and (avg) 15% discretionary bonus in exchange for low job security, high pressure & low control. Most neither create the esoteric products (marketing dept) nor set the rules (risk dept) but live with them. If the media needs a story how about: RISK MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS TRICKY STRUCTURED PRODUCTS BANKING REGULATON UK PLCs OVER-EXPOSURE TO FIN SERVICES I

Date: 19 Nov 2008
Name/Email: Goldfinger ()
Company:
Bankers have historically been idiots. Nothing has changed in that regard. Their biggest problem for the forseeable future will not be bonuses, but rather finding liquid clients to rob. Those that do that will be paid handsomely. Risk taking at banks is a thing of the past.

Date: 23 Nov 2008
Name/Email: Average Joe ()
Company:
edster999. A lot of the criticism in the media (and by politicians) is by people who have a bare understanding of what they're talking about, but are able to put together a sensationalist headline. If these guys were any good at their jobs, and had real investigative skills and academic qualifications, the issues they report with glee would have been outed and discussed properly years ago. Good point about the bonus system though - the majority of people working in the city don't earn the astounding figures mentioned (Dick Fuld etc). For the average joe, the equivalent £s per hour worked and the sacrifice of a personal life for a potentially 0 bonus might make people reconsider the culture and whether it's all worth it. However, I don't see why an entire industry and thousands of honest and hard working staff should be castigated because of the few.

Email this article Return to graduate / mba news index
Print article
Search Archive
See all articles 
 
Send us your comments or article ideas

 


Poll
The likelihood of writedowns spreading to corporate debt is:
Very, very low: 0.0%
Lowish: 22.7%
I don't know: 27.3%
Very high: 40.9%
Very, very high: 9.1%
More to say?

ALSO IN THIS SECTION:

MORE NEWS & ADVICE:
JOB MARKET NEWS
PAY NEWS
SALARY SURVEYS
ASK THE EXPERT
SECTORS EXPLAINED
ADVICE
A DAY IN THE LIFE
EMPLOYER PROFILES
© Incisive Media Ltd. 2007 Jobs at Incisive Media | Terms and conditions | Privacy policy | Accessibility statement